King George and the State of the Union
Reporting live from his living room, while watching dubya on television....and typing on his laptop - lil' ol' me.
He opened his speech with some nice little domestic items - but nothing incredibly new that hasn't been bandied about Congress for quite some time. These would be nice if they can get done but we shall see.
The main part of dubya's speech was in defense of his failed Iraq policy and pleading with a hostile Congress to authorize more troops to send over there.
But Iraq will not be stabilized with more American troops. We need to have more international troops there - sent by the United Nations - who have an interest in peace/stability in the middle east. With more UN authorized troops, the American military can begin to withdraw from Iraq. I think the US Armed forces are spread out too thin as it is.
Hopefully the Democratic controlled Congress will tighten the purse strings. Sen. Clinton was interviewed on ABC after the speech and she said that she'd like to see the funds we're using to subsidize the Iraqui troops taken away. Perhaps this will make them realize that they need to defend their own country from insurgents. I really think the majority of Iraqui citizens would like nothing better than to see American forces pull out somewhat if not all together.
Of course the question is - can the newly elected Iraqui government withstand all of the insurgent factions who would then likely start/continue civil war to gain power? Can the US handle another hostile government to American interests come to power if the current leadership is overthrown?
If I knew the answer to that...
8 Comments:
"We need to have more international troops there - sent by the United Nations"
And why should the rest of the world (which incidently told the US NOT to invade) have to clean up their mess.
I really think this falls under the 'you broke it, you bought it' category. Don't ask the rest of the world to fix america's blunder
why not?? how often has the United States come in and helped out other counries? I'm not just talking militarily but with food, medicine and other necessities to basic living. If this is truly to be a world community then yes, the UN should pitch in and help out.
Worldwide community also means general consensus, something Dubya not only did not have but threw his middle finger up in defiance at (forgive the preposition)
I agree that w didn't ask for or get a general consensus from the UN. Still, the relevant question I think is that we are in a worldwide community and despite how we got there, the UN should flex what muscle it has and insist that its troops be sent in.
See, I think if there were more UN troops than US troops on the ground in Iraq then perhaps- perhaps there would be less insurgent violence among Iraqui citizens, since there is a great resentment to the US military presence in Iraq now.
"since there is a great resentment to the US military presence in Iraq now."
and i can't imagine why...
:;sigh::
Good questions. I've written about the same things the last two posts. I'm sorry I've been as absent as I've been lately, but life is like a whirlwind around me, and I'm trying to battle my way through the storm!
Since most other countries udnerstand that the UN is a pawn of Western imperialism, I doubt very seriously that the violence would end.
Post a Comment
<< Home